hp gpu adreno 530

Fullyrelease the potential of GPU to continuously improve gaming experience It launches in two variations, Adreno 530 and Adreno 510 The Qualcomm Adreno 512 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based) Qualcomm® Adreno™ 508 GPU: Up to 30% better graphics and enhanced gaming performance1 for lifelike Whatis Mali Gpu Vs Adreno. Likes: 604. Shares: 302. GPU Qualcomm Adreno™ 530; Change OS/API/Etc. Android . OpenGL . Qualcomm Adreno™ 530. Add another device Car Chase Onscreen N/A; Offscreen N/A; 1440p Manhattan 3.1.1 Offscreen Render Quality - HP N/A; Battery lifetime - Manhattan 3.1 N/A; Long term performance - Manhattan 3.1 N/A; Battery lifetime - T-Rex N/A; QualcommTechnologies will be among the first to ship conformant Vulkan drivers, starting with Snapdragon 820's embedded Adreno 530 GPU, and subsequently with our Adreno 4xx series GPUs This is an initial version of support for the Adreno a6xx GPU family starting with the a630 from the sdm845 SoC Dental Implant Grants While working with a game 2016 64 bit, quad-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 1536 Kbyte L2, 14 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 530 GPU | All details | Add to compare. Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 Lite. 2015, 64 bit, quad-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 1536 Kbyte L2, 14 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 530 GPU lời bài hát tình ca tây nguyên. The Radeon 530 is a dedicated entry-level graphics card for laptops that was released in 2017. According to AMD, there are several different versions with 384 or 320 shader units and DDR3 or GDDR5 64-bit graphics memory. However, they are not based on one of the newer RX series Polaris chips, but most likely using the same architecture as the Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M 384 shader units, 28 nm GCN and M430 / M330 / M230 320 shader units, 28 nm Sun GCN. AMD claims that the clock speed of the Radeon 530 can reach 1,024 MHz. Considering the above, the game performance of the Radeon 530 should fall between the Radeon R7 M440 320 shader units, DDR3, Radeon R7 M460 384 shader units, DDR3 and Radeon R7 M445 320 shader units, GDDR5 see these pages for detailed gaming benchmarks. Graphically intensive games such as Dishonored 2, Call of Duty Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 should not run smoothly on this GPU. Less demanding games like Overwatch, Fifa 17 with a fast CPU, or Farming Simulator 17, would run well, but using low to medium detail settings. For detailed game benchmarks, visit the pages of the previously linked cards. According to the specs, the DDR3 version could be slower than the Radeon 520, that is specified with 320 shaders and 500 SeriesRadeon 530 384 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzRadeon 520 320 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzArchitectureGCNPipelines384 - unifiedCore Speed1024 MHzMemory Speed2250 MHzMemory Bus Width64 BitMemory TypeDDR3, GDDR5Max. Amount of Memory2048 MBShared MemorynoAPIDirectX 12, Shader OpenGL nmFeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL VulkanDate of Link to Manufacturer Page Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Scoremin 486 avg 514 median 497 2% max 559 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphicsmin 424 avg median 443 1% max 490 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 69759 avg 105231 median 107458 13% max 136248 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 43413 avg 52303 median 49386 7% max 67025 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 3749 avg 6603 median 6371 7% max 8707 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 6266 avg 8145 median 9210 2% max 9466 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 1062 avg 1419 median 1386 0% max 1810 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 1224 avg 1579 median 1542 2% max 1990 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 56520 avg 67535 median 8% max 89565 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 2121 avg 2496 median 2508 4% max 2935 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 2113 avg 2355 median 2327 2% max 2654 Points 3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 6283 avg 6338 median 2% max 6392 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 5074 avg 5369 median 3% max 5663 Points 3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standardmin 16614 avg 17513 median 17513 19% max 18412 Points 3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +3DMark 06min 9517 avg 11377 median 11481 16% max 13132 Points Unigine Valley - Unigine Valley DXmin avg median 2% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven DX 11min avg 17 median 17 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven OpenGLmin avg median 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Heaven highmin avg 20 median 20 4% max fps Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 5166 avg 7436 median 7731 5% max 9411 points Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 10% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 11% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin avg 98 median 98 98% max 98 % GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 3% max fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 12% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 3% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Room GPUmin 189 avg median 1% max 222 Samples/s LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Sala GPUmin 353 avg median 1% max 420 Samples/s ComputeMark - ComputeMark Resultmin 741 avg 992 median 895 1% max 1341 points Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *min 43 avg median 12% max 58 Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiencymin avg median 13% max Points per Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Points per Watt 15% Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultraClock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksVery Low Overall Quality DX11 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLowest Preset 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLow Preset TAA 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. Adreno 530 650 MHz is a mid-range GPU designed for mobile CPUs which are used in phones and tablets, date of announcement 2015. The GPU manufactured using 14 nm process technology. Adreno 530 has 256 ALUs working at 650 MHz and works with graphics, or in simple terms the GPU helps games pleasing to the eye and seem well and more beautiful, for instance GTA, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9 and many others. You can understand Adreno 530 650 MHz GPU is good or bad from benchmark results and comparisons with other graphics processing 530 650 MHz GPU specificationsGeneral InfoNameAdreno 530Codename Generation5Frequency650 MHzALU256Process14 nmGFLOPs FP32 Single Precision GFLOPsTriangle Fillrate335 MT/sPixel GP/sMemory GB/sRelease date2015-12-01DisplayDirectX11Displays support2Video encoding/decodingJPEGDecode & EncodeAV1Decode & Encodeh264Decode & EncodeVP8Decode & EncodeVC-1Decode & Encodeh265/HEVC 8 bitDecode & EncodeVP9Decode & Encodeh265/HEVC 10 bitDecode & EncodeAVCDecode & EncodeTechnologyOpenGL ES 12,OpenCL VR video playback, 8K 360 VR video playback,Vulkan informationDynamic hardware tessellation, RenderScript, General-Purpose GPU GPGPU performance, Shared Virtual memory, Android Extension Pack, Advanced API supportAdreno 530 GPU 650 MHz review• GPU Fortnite Mobile• GPU Devices lists• GPU SoCs lists• GPU Benchmarks• GPU PUBG mobile• Antutu 8• 3DMark• GeekBench 5 mobileAdreno 530 GPU Comparisons• Vs Adreno 615 700MHz• Vs Adreno 610 750MHz• Vs PowerVR GM 9446 970MHz• Vs Adreno 540 710MHz• Vs Adreno 612 700MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP20 546MHz• Vs Adreno 616 500MHz• Vs Adreno 618 700MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP18 850MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP2 850MHz• Vs PowerVR GM 9446 800MHz• Vs Mali-G76 MP5 700MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP6 850MHz• Vs Adreno 630 650MHz• Vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 800MHz• Vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 900MHz• Vs Adreno 530 624MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP12 650MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP12 850MHz• Vs Adreno 512 850MHz• Vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 950MHz• Vs Adreno 509 850MHz• Vs PowerVR 7XTP-MT4 820MHz• Vs Mali-T760 MP8 772MHz• Vs Adreno 510 600MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP3 700MHz• Vs PowerVR GE8320 650MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP3 800MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP4 950MHz• Vs PowerVR GX6250 650MHz• Vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 820MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP18 546MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 900MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 875MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP8 1037MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP3 1200MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 780MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 850MHz• Vs Adreno 530 510MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP2 614MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP4 800MHz• Vs PowerVR GM 9444 800MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP10 650MHz• Vs Mali-T860 MP4 922MHz• Vs PowerVR GT7400 Plus 800MHz• Vs Mali-470 MP4 650MHz• Vs Mali-T604 MP4 533MHz• Vs Mali-T658 MP6 600MHz• Vs Mali-T678 MP8 700MHz• Vs Mali-G51 MP6 1000MHz• Vs PowerVR GT7600 900MHz• Vs PowerVR GT7600 650MHz• Vs Mali-G310 MP6 800MHz• Vs Mali-G57 MP1 650MHz• Vs Mali-G57 MP1 750MHz• Vs Mali-G710 MC10 850MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP1 800MHz• Vs Adreno 730 900MHz• Vs Adreno 740 980MHz• Vs Adreno 725 950MHz• Vs Mali-G57 MC1 2EE 750MHz

hp gpu adreno 530